HPC user support list: Difference between revisions

From Cheaha
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* Dr. Eta Berner
* Dr. Eta Berner
* John Sandefur (CCC)
* John Sandefur (CCC)
*
* Lynne Gauthier, Graduate Research Associate, Neuroimaging Lab, CI Therapy Research Group, University of Alabama - Birmingham, 857-998-7785, lynnevg@uab.edu <mailto:lynnevg@uab.edu>.  Just to give you an update, I got my account at ASA, so now am just waiting on the code to be sent.  Unrelated to this, the lab is currently submitting a grant for a multisite randomized clinical trial with neuroimaging.  This would entail collecting ~1,200 scans.  We are wondering whether, given the large volume of data, the network would still be available to us for this project if funded.  We realize that this is a very large amount of data and would not want to clog the resources.  If this is a concern, would it be possible to contribute some additional computing resources to the network (so that we would not hog the current resources) and still have the benefit of using the computing network for processing? We would not require a storage solution for this data and would have a back-up data system already in
place.  Thanks.

Revision as of 01:13, 26 September 2008

  • Dr. Jim Mobely (Surgey) potential caBIG user
  • SSG users (Public Health)
  • Dr. Jere Segrest
  • Dr. Elliott L
  • Dr. Eta Berner
  • John Sandefur (CCC)
  • Lynne Gauthier, Graduate Research Associate, Neuroimaging Lab, CI Therapy Research Group, University of Alabama - Birmingham, 857-998-7785, lynnevg@uab.edu <mailto:lynnevg@uab.edu>. Just to give you an update, I got my account at ASA, so now am just waiting on the code to be sent. Unrelated to this, the lab is currently submitting a grant for a multisite randomized clinical trial with neuroimaging. This would entail collecting ~1,200 scans. We are wondering whether, given the large volume of data, the network would still be available to us for this project if funded. We realize that this is a very large amount of data and would not want to clog the resources. If this is a concern, would it be possible to contribute some additional computing resources to the network (so that we would not hog the current resources) and still have the benefit of using the computing network for processing? We would not require a storage solution for this data and would have a back-up data system already in

place. Thanks.