Talk:NAMD Benchmarks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
===Bench mark notes=== | ===Bench mark notes=== | ||
The above benchmarks were run using NAMD 2.8b1 and the Apoa1 benchmark suite from NAMD. | |||
On Cheaha only the third generation hardware was used for the above benchmarks. More information about the hardware used on [[Cheaha]] is available [[Cheaha#Hardware |here]]. | |||
== Comparison of Ethernet and IB == | == Comparison of Ethernet and IB == | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 26 May 2011
The efficiency of a parallel system describes the fraction of the time that is being used by the processors for a given computation. It is defined as
Execution time using one processor ts
E(n)= -------------------------------------- = ----
N * Execution time using N processors N tn
In general, parallel jobs should scale to at least 70% efficiency. The ASC's DMC recommends a scaling efficiency of 75% or greater. For NAMD the efficiency of a parallel job can be calculated as follows (where N is processors committed to the job):
days/ns where N = 1
--------------------- * 100 = Efficiency
N * days/ns
Information on NAMD performance Scaling is available at: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/wiki/?NamdPerformanceTuning
Benchmark used for performance evaluation on the Cheaha, Biowulf, and DMC is Apoa1 from the NAMD suite and is available at: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/utilities/
The parameters for the benchmark used through out are: 500 steps, 92K atoms, 12A cutoff + PME every 4 steps.
Sample Benchmark using NAMD
Sample Benchmark comparing Days/ns for Cheaha, Biowulf, and DMC using InfiniBand
| Processors | Cheaha | Biowulf | DMC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.4054 (100%) | 18.0535 (100%) | 19.1000 (100%) |
| 2 | 7.7119 (99.87%) | 9.5163 (94.86%) | 9.7600 (97.84%) |
| 4 | 3.8933 (98.92%) | 4.9222 (91.69%) | 4.7570 (100.3%)* |
| 8 | 1.9653 (97.98%) | 2.5763 (87.59%) | 2.5360 (94.14%) |
| 16 | 0.9950 (96.76%) | 1.2658 (89.14%) | 1.3870 (86.06%) |
| 32 | 0.5101 (94.37%) | 0.6463 (87.29%) | 0.7438 (80.24%) |
| 64 | 0.2592 (92.83%) | 0.3390 (83.22%) | 0.3938 (75.78%) |
| 128 | 0.1360 (88.45%) | NA | NA |
| 256 | 0.0770 (78.09%) | NA | NA |
Bench mark notes
The above benchmarks were run using NAMD 2.8b1 and the Apoa1 benchmark suite from NAMD. On Cheaha only the third generation hardware was used for the above benchmarks. More information about the hardware used on Cheaha is available here.